A warning against downplaying / spreading misinformation about Coronavirus (Moosaa Richardson)

Based on the aayah:

وَإِذَا جَآءَهُمۡ أَمۡرٞ مِّنَ ٱلۡأَمۡنِ أَوِ ٱلۡخَوۡفِ أَذَاعُواْ بِهِۦۖ وَلَوۡ رَدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱلرَّسُولِ وَإِلَىٰٓ أُوْلِي ٱلۡأَمۡرِ مِنۡهُمۡ لَعَلِمَهُ ٱلَّذِينَ يَسۡتَنۢبِطُونَهُۥ مِنۡهُمۡۗ وَلَوۡلَا فَضۡلُ ٱللَّهِ عَلَيۡكُمۡ وَرَحۡمَتُهُۥ لَٱتَّبَعۡتُمُ ٱلشَّيۡطَٰنَ إِلَّا قَلِيلٗا

And when there comes to them information about [public] security or fear, they spread it around. But if they had referred it back to the Messenger or to those of authority among them, then the ones who [can] draw correct conclusions from it would have known about it. And if not for the favor of Allah upon you and His mercy, you would have followed Satan, except for a few.

(Surah An-Nisa’:83)

Students of knowledge who spread inaccurate medical information and advice (Sh ar-Ramlee)

Questions from a Muslim Doctor in the West:

[1]:

There are some students of knowledge in the West who give medical advice on the internet. However, they are not doctors and have not trained in the fields which they give advice about. They tell people to treat themselves through changing their diet, while warning against well-established medical treatments such as vaccinations and medication for preventing heart attacks, using weak medical evidence to support their claims.

What would you advise these students?

 

Shaykh’s answer: Wa alaykumusSalaam wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuh, I advise these young men to return to the people of knowledge with regard to understanding the Book and the Sunnah. And the Prophetic medicine is a science of the Islamic legislation – it is not permissible for someone who is not proficient in it and who did not learn it at the hands of the scholars to speak about it. And censuring the medicine that is established by scientific tests is wrong, and the doctors used to practice a lot of it at the time of the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) and he did not censure them; and it is included in the generality of the Prophet’s (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) statement: “Indeed Allaah has created both disease and remedy, so treat yourselves but don’t treat yourselves with that which is prohibited.” [as-Saheehah 1633 authenticated by Sh al-Albaani (slightly different wording from the hadith mentioned above)] And Allaah knows best.

 

[2]:

These students say that they wish to revive the Prophetic medicine. For example one of them says that “labanan khaalisan” [Soorat-un-Nahl:66] refers only to milk which has not been pasteurised. He says that drinking unpasteurised milk is an, “affirmation of tawheed”, and that drinking pasteurised milk is not in accordance with the sunnah, and is in fact harmful. He says that modern doctors prescribe medicines which prolong illness so that pharmaceutical companies can make more money. He says that the modern medical profession is based upon, “mu‘tazilee”, principles. He likens taking certain medications to the impatience of those who revolt against the rulers.

Is the approach of this student correct, as we have not heard the like of this from our ‘ulemaa?

 

Shaykh’s answer: The answer to this is like the answer to the previous (question), as it has branched off from it.

 

[3]:

We have advised these students, but they have not responded to our advice. Some of the common people have been influenced by these ideas, and they think that it is better to take only herbal and Prophetic Medicine and avoid modern medicines. They are reluctant to take precautions from the spread of diseases, claiming that illness only spreads by the permission of Allaah. We know of people who have become ill through following the advice of these students.

Should we as Muslim doctors publicly explain the errors of these students to the common people? Should we do so even if we are accused of causing splitting?

 

Shaykh’s answer: Yes, it is obligatory upon you to make their mistake clear to the people; and spread the speech of the scholars with regard to these issues and connect the people to the scholars, as these people are harming the people in the name of religion while they perceive not, and they think that they are doing good. There is no doubt that from modern medicine there is that which is beneficial and also that which is harmful, and there is no doubt about the existence of business companies whose concern is to gain profit. But that does not mean that everything made by the modern method of medicine is not beneficial; and in the like of this, it is obligatory to return to the trustworthy people among them who are duly qualified and have experience in order to know what is beneficial and what is harmful. And likewise, the Prophetic medicine is in need of one who understands it with a correct understanding so that it would be beneficial for the people because everyone who (just) read a book about that is not able to understand it. And there is no doubt that disease spreads by the permission of Allaah but the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said to us: flee from the leper like you flee from a lion, and he prohibited us from entering the place where there is plague and prohibited its people from leaving it, as a way of preventing the spread of the disease, and the discussion goes on. In general, it is obligatory to return to the scholars with regard to that. And Allaah knows best.

 

[Answered by Shaikh Ali ar-Ramlee hafizahullaah]

 

Download full PDF here:

Sh Ramlee

It is not permissible to speak about something which you do not have correct specialist knowledge of (such as the Deen, or medical matters etc.) – Sh al-Albaani

Before answering the question I want to remind you of a principle accepted by those who are not Muslims too: that it is not permissible for someone who is ignorant of [a particular field of] knowledge to speak about it, because doing so goes against texts from the Book and the Sunnah, from them is the saying of our Lord, the Blessed and Most High:

وَلَا تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ ۚ إِنَّ السَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ وَالْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُولَٰئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْئُولًا

“And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight and the heart–about all those [one] will be questioned.” [Israa 17:36].

So for example it is not permissible for the one who wants to speak about medicine to do so if he is a scholar of Quranic exegesis [mufassir], since medicine is not his field. Just as it is not permissible for a doctor who is a specialist in his field to speak about Quranic exegesis or Islamic jurisprudence or other than that, because if both of these people talk about fields which are not their expertise then they have pursued that of which they have no knowledge, and would thus have opposed the previously quoted Quranic text.

I think this is a matter concerning which it is correct to quote the old Arabic parable: this is something about which no two will differ and over which no two rams will clash horns, i.e., it is not permissible for anyone to speak about a certain [field of] knowledge except for the specialists in it.


After this I come back to saying that it is not permissible for any person to speak about that which is not his specialism–particularly when it is clear that his speech in the field about which he has spoken without knowledge opposes that of those who are specialists in it.

https://thealbaanisite.com/2011/06/20/musa-and-the-angel-of-death-1/

The Relationship Between Medical Quackery and Shirk (Polytheism)

By Moosaa Richardson (based on the works of Sh Muhammad ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhaab and Sh Uthaymeen

The Relationship Between Medical Quackery and Shirk (Polytheism)

Quote:
However, sometimes it is merely baseless presumptions and imagination at work, when a sick person only assumes the treatment is effective (in a medically unproven way), and thus he relaxes and imagines that he is recovering, having a positive psychological effect on him (i.e. placebos), perhaps making him feel genuinely happier, and thereafter the illness even goes away. Even in such a case, it is still not permissible to rely upon such treatments, nor is it allowed to consider them (genuine) medicine. This is to keep the people from giving in to baseless presumptions and illusion. Thus, wearing bracelets, strings, and similar things to alleviate illness or prevent it has been forbidden. Whatever is not an established spiritual or medical means of recovery is not allowed to be considered a genuine means of recovery. That is because this actually includes a kind of infringement upon the (exclusive) Dominion and Authority of Allaah, the Most High, and ascribing partners to Him, in how others are considered to share with Allaah, the Most High, in providing the legitimate and effective means (for recovery or maintenance of good health).

The Danger of Ignorant People Delving into Medical Issues (Ibn-ul-Qayyim)

Physicians and medical responsibility

It is related by Aboo Daawood, al-Nisaa’ee and Ibn Maajah, from hadeeth of ‘Amr ibn Shu‘ayb, from his father, from his grandfather: The Messenger of Allaah sallallaahu‘alaihiwasallam said:

من تطبّب ولم يعلم منه طب قبل ذلك فهو ضامن

“If anyone carries out medical treatment, yet previously he was not known as a medical man, then he takes the responsibility.”[1]

This hadeeth is concerned with three points, one linguistic, one legal and one medical.

The words of the Prophet sallallaahu‘alaihiwasallam were: “Whoever practises medicine (tatabbaba)”, he did not say “whoever is a physician (tabba)”. The expression of the fifth form (tafa‘ala) indicates some constraint in the action, and entering into it with difficulty, and that the one so described is not originally one of its practitioners. Similarly, we find the expressions: to attempt clemency (tahallama), to show courage (tashajja‘a), to adopt patience (tasabbara) and others of this kind. Thus, ‘to force oneself’ (takallafa) is formed upon this pattern. The poet said: ‘And Qays of ‘Aylaan, and whoever sought to be a Qays (taqayyasa).

The legal (shar‘ee) aspect is that this hadeeth establishes the liability of the ignorant practitioner. For if he assumes the knowledge and practice of medicine, without formerly having any acquaintance with it, by his ignorance he risks causing harm to the lives of people; he practises irresponsibly what he does not know and, thus, deceives the sick person. Therefore he must be held responsible. This is the consensus among all scholars.

Al-Khattaabee said: I do not know of any disagreement regarding the fact that when a person carrying out treatment transgresses the limits of his knowledge and expertise and causes harm to the patient he should be held responsible. One who lays claim to knowledge or practice which he does not have is an impostor. When injury is brought about by his action, he is responsible for the blood-money, and he has no right to retaliation (qawad); for he has no authority without the sick person’s permission. The consequences of the practitioner’s felony – according to the opinion of most jurists – falls upon his clan (‘aaqila).

My own comment:[2] there are five categories:

[2]: The second example is that of an ignorant practitioner who treats a person and injures him. In this case if the person thus injured knew that he was ignorant, that is to say, without knowledge of his profession, yet permitted him to treat him, the practitioner is not held responsible. This kind is not opposed by the obvious sense of the hadeeth. For the context and purport of the words show that he deceived the sick person, and made him think he was a physician, while he was not. If the sick person thinks him to be a physician and permits him to treat him on the basis of his knowledge, the physician is responsible for any injury he commits. Similarly, if he prescribes him some medicine to take, and the patient thinks that he has prescribed it because of his knowledge and skill, yet is injured thereby, he is responsible for that. The hadeeth here is clear and obvious.

 

 

__________

[1] An-Nasaa’ee (4830, 4831), Saheeh Ibn Maajah (2791), Aboo Daawood (4586) – Hasan (Sh Al-Albaanee).

[2] i.e. Ibn-ul-Qayyim’s comment

 

[From AtTibb-un-Nabawee by Ibn-ul-Qayyim, translated by P. Johnstone, pp101-106, with additional takhreej of the ahadeeth]